In Our Opinion:
Gardella has been relentlessly spewing venom at Hughes during his now discredited political harassment assault, investing months upon months peddling sexual harassment fabrications and refusing to release a report that fully clears Hughes. All the while, Gardella claimed that he wanted to safeguard the so-called anonymous complainant. Yet, it’s become glaringly obvious that Gardella has no qualms about exposing the identity of another complainant in an ADA complaint — just because it originates from Hughes.
The complaint in question uncovers illegal ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) violations in public works projects, specifically at the Dunn Center and the Reading Country Clubs. These violations were fully authorized and endorsed by Gardella, Vollmer, and Bell, under the tainted guidance of the unscrupulous Schnee Legal Services, amounting to a staggering $1.9 million in obligatory repairs and demolitions.
Public officials, like second class township supervisors, are duty-bound to maintain confidentiality and protect the privacy of individuals who report issues, including ADA-related complaints. Exposing the identity of an anonymous ADA complaint author can lead to allegations of invasion of privacy, harassment, or retaliation, carrying legal and ethical repercussions under state laws or professional standards.